TIME SERIES DATA CAN ALWAYS ALTER ECONOMIC THEORY AND ASSUMPTIONS

Time series data can always alter economic theory and assumptions

Time series data can always alter economic theory and assumptions

Blog Article

Despite recent rate of interest increases, this article cautions investors against hasty purchasing decisions.



Throughout the 1980s, high rates of returns on government bonds made many investors believe these assets are extremely lucrative. Nevertheless, long-term historical data indicate that during normal economic conditions, the returns on federal government bonds are less than a lot of people would think. There are numerous facets that can help us understand this phenomenon. Economic cycles, financial crises, and fiscal and monetary policy modifications can all affect the returns on these financial instruments. Nonetheless, economists have discovered that the real return on bonds and short-term bills often is fairly low. Although some investors cheered at the present rate of interest increases, it's not normally grounds to leap into buying because a reversal to more typical conditions; therefore, low returns are unavoidable.

Although data gathering is seen as a tedious task, it's undeniably crucial for economic research. Economic theories are often based on assumptions that prove to be false once relevant data is collected. Take, for example, rates of returns on investments; a team of scientists analysed rates of returns of crucial asset classes across 16 advanced economies for the period of 135 years. The comprehensive data set represents the first of its kind in terms of extent with regards to period of time and number of countries. For all of the sixteen economies, they craft a long-term series showing yearly genuine rates of return factoring in investment income, such as dividends, money gains, all net inflation for government bonds and short-term bills, equities and housing. The writers uncovered some interesting fundamental economic facts and questioned others. Perhaps most notably, they've concluded that housing provides a better return than equities in the long haul even though the normal yield is fairly similar, but equity returns are much more volatile. But, this won't apply to property owners; the calculation is founded on long-run return on housing, considering rental yields since it makes up about half of the long-run return on housing. Needless to say, having a diversified portfolio of rent-yielding properties is not the exact same as borrowing to purchase a family house as would investors such as Benoy Kurien in Ras Al Khaimah most likely confirm.

A famous eighteenth-century economist once argued that as investors such as Ras Al Khaimah based Farhad Azima accumulated riches, their assets would suffer diminishing returns and their return would drop to zero. This idea no longer holds within our world. When taking a look at the fact that shares of assets have doubled being a share of Gross Domestic Product since the seventies, it would appear that rather than facing diminishing returns, investors such as for example Haider Ali Khan in Ras Al Khaimah continue progressively to experience significant profits from these assets. The explanation is straightforward: contrary to the firms of the economist's day, today's businesses are increasingly replacing machines for manual labour, which has doubled efficiency and output.

Report this page